INVESTIGATING CONSUMER RESPONSIVENESS TO MOBILE MARKETING IN JOHANNESBURG

Junior Mudavanhu, L. Naidoo

Abstract


Traditional communication mix elements have become pricey. Therefore there is a growing need for marketers to find cheaper alternatives to communicate with their target audience. Mobile phone marketing will lower the costs of advertising and at the same time improve relationships between marketers and consumers as it targets the personal element of marketing communication. According to research, 29 million people use mobile phones in South Africa. The research objectives seek to determine the different uses of mobile technology by consumers, how mobile phone users interact with mobile marketing techniques, and to make recommendations on the optimal use of mobile marketing. This quantitative study established that, although it might not be the first choice of receiving marketing communications, the majority of the people would still like to receive adverts via their mobile, proving that mobile marketing has a place in marketing. The findings revealed that 34% of South African mobile phone users have smartphones, this creates a new market for mobile internet, social media, and mobile email adverts. It is important that marketers should also use other methods of marketing communication mix as 28 million people use radio and 26 million people use televisions in South Africa, proving that these gadgets are still important in the consumers’ lives and in information sharing. Mobile marketing cannot replace the conventional marketing communication methods completely but can complement the efforts and create an interactive platform for marketers and their consumers.

Keywords


mobile marketing; communication methods; mobile adverts.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2006). Marketing management. 12th edition. New Jersey. Pearson Prentice Hall.

GSMA (2014). State of the Industry 2013: Mobile financial services for the unbanked. Available: http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-. [Accessed February 1, 2011].

Leon G. Schiffman, L.G. & Kanuk L. (2009). Consumer Buyer 5th edition. New Jersey. Prentice Hall,

Jobber, D. & Ellis-Chadwick F. (2013). Principles and practice of marketing. United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education.

Kristina Heinonen, K. & Strandvik, T. (2005). Communication as an element of service value, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 16 Iss: 2, pp.186 – 198

Anckar & D’Incau, 2000 Customer relationship management through mobile technologies: exploratory study on Indian Youth. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change Volume 3 Issue 4, October 2012 pp 65-83

Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2009). Marketing management. 13th Edition. New Jersey. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hutton, J. (2011). Mobile phones dominate in South Africa, Mobile Insights Available: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2011/mobile-phones-dominate-in-south-africa.html. [Accessed 13 March 2017]

Andrews, L. Drennan, J. & Russell-Bennett, R. (2012). Linking perceived value of mobile marketing with the experiential consumption of mobile phones, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46 Iss: 3/4, 18.

Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students 4th edition. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S. (2007). Business research methods 9th edition. McGraw-Hill: New York.

Shuttleworth, 2008 Shuttleworth, M. (2008). How to choose between different research methods. Experiment resources. Available at: http://www.experiment-resources.com/different-research-methods.html [Accessed February 1, 2011].

Shamoo A.E. & Resnik, D.B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research. UK: Oxford University Press


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Marketing and HR

Copyright © 2015 Journal of Marketing and HR. All rights reserved.

ISSN 2455-2178

For any help/support contact us at editorial@scitecresearch.com.