Causes a Gap between the Expectations of Auditors and Users of Audit Reports
Abstract
The present paper aims to study the expectation gap between the auditors and the users of financial information with regard to the financial reports assurance, decision-making profitability based on the audited financial information, and responsibility for such information. Expectation gap between the auditors and the users of financial reports is a factor, which results in the ambiguity in the auditors role and users perception of it. In this context, meticulous and viable research must be conducted so that this expectation gap can be reduced and removed. This necessity has provided a foundation for the implementation of the present study. In this view, the following assumptions are taken into account. A significant difference exists between the expectation of the users and that of the auditors in terms of auditing responsibility, assurance, and decision-making profitability. For analysis of the data and test of the assumptions, preliminary data have been collected using some questionnaire and research variables have thus been calculated. In the present study, with regard to the proposed assumptions, the t test with two independent samples has been applied. Statistical test results indicate the justification of the three above relations in the proposed assumptions in the present study. It is recommended that our findings should be applied by the specialists and researchers for elimination of such expectation gap.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bagherzadeh, S. (2000). A Second Thought on the Role and Position of Auditing Committees in the Procedure of Financial Reporting Concerning the Partnership Corporations. Auditor Magazine. No 9.
Bozorgasl, M. 1998. Role of independent auditor in society: A new approach for reduction of expectation gap. Magazine for Accounting and Auditing Investigation. 6th year. No 22, 23.
Chowdhury , Riazur R. et al., (2005) ,"The public sector audit expectations gap in Bangladesh ", Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 893-908
Dewing Ian p. and Russell peter D. (2003) "UK Fund managers, audit regulation and the new accountancy foundation: towards a narrowing of the audit expectation gap", Managerial auditing Journal, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp.537-545.
Dixon and Wood head, A.D., (2006), "An investigation of the expectation gap in Egypt", managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 293-302.
Fadzly, Mohamed Nazir and Ahmad, Zauwiyal, (2004), "Audit expectation gap: The case of Malaysia", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 897-915.
Frank, Kimberly E., et al., (2001), " the expectation gap: perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and student", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 145-149.
Hassas Yeganeh, Y. (2005). Challenges in professional judgment on Auditing. Official Accountant Magazine. No 10, 11.
Hassas Yeganeh, Y., Khaleghi Baigi, A. (2003). Expectational distance between auditors and users of credibility service of independent auditors. Magazine for Accounting and Auditing Investigation. 11th year. No 35.
Koh, Hian Chye and Woo, E-Sah , (1998), " The expectation gap in auditing" Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 147-154.
Rahmani, A. (2001). Evaluation of Financial Reporting Quality. Auditor Magazine. No 17.
Ravi, H. (1993). Auditing reports: Nature, Current Structure, and Future Outlooks. Accounting Magazine. No 95, 96
. Salehi, M. and Rostami, V., (2009), "Audit expectation gap", International Journal of academic research. Vol. 1, No. 1, 140-152.
Shaikh, Journal M. and Talha, Mohammad, (2003), "Credibility and expectation gap in reporting on uncertainties", Managerial auditing Journal, Vol. 18, No. 6-7, pp. 517-529.
Sidani, Yusuf Munir, (2007), "The audit expectation gap: evidence form Lebanon", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 288-302.
Sirani, M. et al. (2008). Effect of Experiment and Complexity of Issues in Auditing on the Auditors Judgment. Accounting Investigation Magazine. No 55.
Talaneh, A., Nakhjavani, H. (1992). Decision-making procedure of the individuals using accounting Information. Accountant Magazine. No 83, 84.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright© 2015 Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management. All rights reserved.
ISSN 2395-2210
For any help/support contact us at editorial@scitecresearch.com, jrbem@scitecresearch.com.