Selection Listing Decisions: New Product Adoption of Food Retailers

Anikó Kelemen-Erdős

Abstract


Retail selection policy determines the competitiveness of retailers. This is even truer of the bustling food retail market, thus assortment determination is crucial in grounding profitability. This paper describes an analysis of new product listing decisions to provide a tool-kit for food-retailers and ideas for producers in this domain.

The research applies in-depth interviews among the largest and some smaller international and domestic retailers in Hungary to explore the characteristics of their listing decisions. To examine the interviews, content analysis and informed grounded theory methodology are applied. The results include a novel theoretical and practical framework for new product adoption, while two main innovation-related attributes are explored: profit as seen from a global perspective by new arrivals that accept losses on certain products to reach other company targets, and the needs-based perspective which creates more a complex approach to product selection according to customer needs.

The paper first presents an analysis of the secondary literature relating to new product listing and conceptualises the related factors. It then investigates food retailers’ new product adoption decisions in Hungary, emphasising the related strategies. Finally, a model is presented to describe the explored preferences.


Keywords


Selection Policy; Retailing; Listing Decisions; New Product Adoption; Competitiveness; Content Analysis; Informed Grounded Theory.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agárdi I. (2010): Kereskedelmi marketing és menedzsment. [Retail marketing and management]. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Bauer, A., & Agárdi, I. (2012): Értékesítési rendszer és exporttevékenység szerepe a versenyképességben. [The role of distribution and export activity in competitiveness of companies]. TM 9. Working Paper, Corvinus University, Budapest.

Bronnenberg, B. J., & Mela, C. F. (2004): Market roll-out and retailer adoption for new brands. Marketing Science, 23(4), 500-518.

Charmaz, K. (2000): Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N. K., Lincoln, Y.S. ed. (2000): Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

Charmaz, K. (2006): Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Wiltshire.

Charmaz, K. (2017): Special invited paper: Continuities, contradictions, and critical inquiry in Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-8.

Collins-Dodd, C., & Louviere, J. J. (1999): Brand equity and retailer acceptance of brand extensions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 6(1), 1-13.

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990): Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Sociologie, 19/6, 418–427.

Corsten, D. & Kumar, N. (2005): Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? An empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 80-94.

Davies, G. (1994): The delisting of products by retail buyers. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(6), 473‐493.

Dörnyei, K., & Mitev, A. (2010): Netnográfia avagy on-line karosszék-etnográfia a marketingkutatásban. [Netnography or online arm-chair etnography in marketing research]. Vezetéstudomány/Budapest Business Review, 41(4), 55–68.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss A. (1967): The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorn, New York.

Glaser, B. G. (1992): Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California.

Hansen, T. H., & Skytte, H. (1998): Retailer buying behaviour: a review. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 8(3), 277-301.

Juhasz, A., Seres, A., & Stauder, M. (2008): Business concentration in the Hungarian food retail market. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 108, 67-80.

Kaufman, P., Jayachandran, S., & Rose, R. L. (2006): The role of relational embeddedness in retail buyers' selection of new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 580-587.

Koul, S., Sinha, P. K., & Mishra, H. G. (2017): Small Retailer’s Merchandise Decision Making: A Grounded Theory Approach. Indore Management Journal, 9(1), 1-15.

Kozinets, R. V. (2002): The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.

KSH [Központi Statisztikai Hivatal/Hungarian Central Statistical Office] (2018): 4.4.9. A kiskereskedelmi üzletek forgalma üzlettípusonként [The turnover of retail stores by store type], available at: http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_evkozi/e_okfa001b. html, downloaded: 16. January 2018.

Lin, J. S. C., & Chang, Y. C. (2012): Retailers' new product acceptance decisions: incorporating the buyer-supplier relationship perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(2), 89-99.

Marx, L. M., & Shaffer, G. (2004): Opportunism in multilateral vertical contracting: nondiscrimination, exclusivity, and uniformity: comment. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 796-801.

Nandonde, F. A., & Kuada, J. (2016): Modern food retailing buying behaviour in Africa: the case of Tanzania. British Food Journal, 118(5), 1163-1178.

Nielsen & Trade magazin (2016): Trade magazin - Kereskedelmi toplista 2016, Az FMCG kiskereskedelmi láncok üzleti rangsora [Trade magazine - Retail toplist 2016, The business rankings of FMCG retail chains], available at: http://trademagazin.hu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Toplista-2016-poszter_HU.pdf, last downloaded: 12. January 2018.

Palandeng, D. I., Kindangen, P., Timbel A., & Massie, J. (2018): Influence Analysis of Supply Chain Management and Supply Chain Flexibility to Competitive Advantage and Impact on Company Performance of Fish Processing in Bitung City. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, (10)1, 1783-1802.

Rao, V. R., & McLaughlin, E. W. (1989): Modeling the decision to add new products by channel intermediaries. The Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 80-88.

Reardon, J., Vianelli, D., & Miller, C. (2017): The effect of COO on retail buyers’ propensity to trial new products. International Marketing Review, 34(2), 311-329.

Shaikh, A., & Gandhi, A. (2016): Small retailer’s new product acceptance in emerging market: a grounded theory approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(3), 547-564.

Sheth, J. N. (1980). A theory of merchandise buying behavior. College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Sinha, P. K., Gupta, S., & Rawal, S. (2017): Brand Adoption by BoP Retailers. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(2), 181-207.

Skytte, H., & Blunch, N. (2001). Food retailers' buying behaviour: An analysis in 16 European countries. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 1(2), 133-145.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J (2008): Basics of qualitative research; 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

Sullivan, M. W. (1997): Slotting allowances and the market for new products. The Journal of Law and Economics, 40(2), 461-494.

Teji, T. N. (2016): Accounting for UK retailers' success: key metrics for success and failure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester.

Thornberg, R. (2012): Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259.

van Everdingen, Y. M., Sloot, L. M., van Nierop, E., & Verhoef, P. C. (2011): Towards a further understanding of the antecedents of retailer new product adoption. Journal of Retailing, 87(4), 579-597.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004): Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

White, J. C., Troy, L. C., & Gerlich, R. N. (2000): The role of slotting fees and introductory allowances in retail buyers’ new-product acceptance decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 291-298.

Vinhas, A. S., Chatterjee, S., Dutta, S., Fein, A., Lajos, J., Neslin, S., Ross, W. T., Scheer, L. K., & Wang, Q. (2010): Channel design, coordination, and performance: Future research directions. Marketing Letters, 21(3), 223-237.

Voima, P., Heinonen, K., & Strandvik, T. (2010): Exploring customer value formation: a customer dominant logic perspective. Hanken School of Economics, Working papers 552. Helsinki.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Copyright© 2015 Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management. All rights reserved.

ISSN 2395-2210

For any help/support contact us at editorial@scitecresearch.com, jrbem@scitecresearch.com.