Discrimination Methods For Solving Recovery and NonRecovery Oil Problems

Taghreed Abdul-Al-Razek Abdul-Motaleb Al-Said

Abstract


Discriminant analysis is one of the most classical classification procedure used to discriminate and differentiate groups as possible by using one or more attributes. It also assigns observations to one of the pre-defined and separated groups. There are many parametric discriminant statistical methods such Fisher’s FDA, quadratic QDA, and logistic LoDA methods, and non-parametric operation researches methods such as maximize minimum of deviations MMD, and minimize sums of deviation MSD methods to discriminate the difference between groups and classify new observations to the suitable group. Operation researches methods are fixable and do not require any assumptions as statistical methods. This study introduces a comparison between three statistical methods and two linear programming models for solving recover and nonrecover oil problems. Section (1) includes an introduction of the study. Section (2) provides a suitable review of statistical and operation researches methods. Section (3) introduces an application of some discrimination methods for solving recovery and nonrecovery Oil data problems. Section (4) includes the analysis and recommendation of the study. Finally, at the end of the study, there is the references section in section (5).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antonogeorgos, G., Panagiotakos, D. B., Priftis, K. N., & Tzonou, A. (2009). Logistic Regression And Linear Discriminant Analyses In Evaluating Factors Associated With Asthma Prevalence Among 10- To 12-Years-Old Children: Divergence And Similarity Of The Two Statistical Methods. International Journal of Pediatrics, 1-6.

BAL, H., Örkcü, H. H., & Çelebioğlu, S. (2006) a. An alternative model to fisher and linear programming approaches in two-group classification problem: minimizing deviations from the group median. G.U. Journal Of Science, vol.19, 49-55.

Banks, W. J., B., A., C., A., & M., A. B. (1991). New Solution Algorithems For The Classification Problem. MSc. Thesis. McMaster University.

Ben Youssef, S., & Rabai, A. (2007). Comparison between statistical approach and linear programming for solving classification problem. International Mathematical Forum, vol.2, 3125-3141.

Dillon, W. R., & Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate Analysis Methods And Applications. Jhon Wiley & Sons.

Fan, X., & Wang, L. (1999). Comparing Linear Discriminant Function With Logistic Regression For The Two-Group Classification Problem. The Journal of Experimental Education, vol.3, 265-286.

Freed, N., & Glover, F. (1979). Simple But Powerful Goal Programming Models For Discriminant Problems. European Journal of Operational Research., vol.7, 44-60.

Joachimsthaler, E. A., & Stam, A. (1990). Mathematical Programming

Approaches for the Classification Problem in Two- Group Discriminant Analysi . Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 25(4), 427-454.

Johnson , R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall.

Lachbruch, P. A. (1974). Discriminant Analysis. Hafner Press.

Lam, K. F., Choo, E. U., & Moy, J. W. (1996). Minimizing Deviations from the Group Mean: A New Linear Programming Approach for the Two-group Classification Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, vol.88, 358–367.

Nath, R., Jacson, W. M., & Jones, T. W. (1992). A comparison of the Classical and the Linear Programming Approach to the Classification Problem in Discriminant Analysis. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers S.A, vol.41, 73-93.

Rausch, J. R., & Kelley, K. (2009). A comparison of Linear and Mixture Models for Discriminant Analysis under Nonnormality. Behavior Research Methods, vol.1, 85-98.

Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Smaoui, S., Chabchoub, H., & Aouni, B. (2009). Mathematical Programming Approaches to Classification Problems. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 1-34.

Timm, N. H.(2002). Applied Multivariat Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York ,Inc.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Progressive Research in Mathematics

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 Journal of Progressive Research in Mathematics. All rights reserved.

ISSN: 2395-0218.

For any help/support contact us at editorial@scitecresearch.com, jprmeditor@scitecresearch.com.